4-2-3-1 so i think this formation can beat against team ?
best coach 88 | 26.02.2009 | Comments: 1
this formation is 4-3-3 and it's so positive :)so.... in 2nd half in 60 minutes or 70 minutes or 80 minutes:-The replacement of Anelka : Drogba-The replacement of Quaresma : Malouda -The replacement of Ballack : De...
best coach 88 | 19.02.2009
this formation is 4-3-3 and it's so positive :)so.... in 2nd half in 60 minutes or 70 minutes or 80 minutes:-The replacement of Anelka : Drogba-The replacement of Quaresma : Malouda -The replacement of Ballack : De...
best coach 88 | 19.02.2009
..............................................................................................................
best coach 88 | 29.01.2009
these players are perfect and very clear , so this formation 4-4-2. Do you think it is strong?
best coach 88 | 27.01.2009
Ballack (CAM)not CM Malouda and Joe Cole are (LM , RM)Essien (DMF)So...What are you feeling this formation?
best coach 88 | 05.01.2009 | Comments: 3
Boy, I hated this break to Premiership, I am glad it's back and it's staring with a good one.A loss would mean trouble for both teams' title aspirations. They might be cautious and chose not to attack in full power. I am predicting a ...
Zola | 08.01.2009 | Comments: 3
As I was thinking for a formation that best suited Chelsea I came up with the 5-3-2. My reasons for coming up with this formation are Chelsea's full-backs. Cole and Bosingwa have wing-back characteristics. So, than why not use a 5...
Redrebel | 18.12.2008 | Comments: 3
Drogba(ST)Deco(LM)Joe Cole (RM)Lampard(LAM)Ballack(RAM)John Mikel Obi (DMF)Ashley Cole(RB)Bosingwa(LB)John Terry(LCB)Carvalho (RCB)Cech(GK)t...
best coach 88 | 13.12.2008 | Comments: 2
John mikel obi and essien are strong defensive midfielders. Lampard and Ballack are attacking midfielders, so Kalou is centre forward(CF) not striker and 1 striker is drogba.
best coach 88 | 09.12.2008 | Comments: 6
As I was reading the Chelsea report for chelseafc.com I saw the formation that was used during the game. It said 4-1-4-1, so I must guess its something like this. Who thinks otherwise?
Redrebel | 08.12.2008 | Comments: 3
First of all some of you are going to kill me for not having a back 4, but guess what Chelsea can play with a back 3 it is not rocket science or super hard to play with a back 3. The midfield looks strong and creative and it can easily support defens...
Redrebel | 22.10.2008 | Comments: 2
